Hillary’s Nose Just Keeps Getting Longer and Longer

Ooops, she did it again! This time trying to rewrite history regarding who said what first in opposing the war in Iraq, her or Sen. Obama.

While campaigning yesterday in Eugene, Oregon Hillary tried to change the timeline of events by saying those keeping records should start in January 2005, when Obama joined the Senate. By moving the measuring stick up a few years, she conveniently avoids her 2002 vote to authorize use of force against Iraq. Nice try Hillary! Try as she might to turn back the hands of time to erase things that have already happened, it won’t work because it is what it is.

She was wrong (lied or misspoke) again, because Obama was speaking out against the war before he even joined the Senate!

Clinton told Oregonians:

“when Sen. Obama came to the Senate he and I have voted exactly the same except for one vote. And that happens to be the facts. We both voted against early deadlines. I actually starting criticizing the war in Iraq before he did.”

A claim that is false, and that’s a FACT!

So Hillary would now like us to believe that record keeping didn’t start before 2005! When will Hillary realize that the truth (the real truth, not her version of it) is what this country needs, and demands from its government, not what we’ve had to endure for the past 7 years.

Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Sphere: Related Content

Bookmark this article!

DiggDel.icio.usRedditStumbleUponFurlma.gnoliaNewsvinePropellerFark

BumpZeeSpurlSlashDotGoogleYahooBlogLinesWindows LiveTechnorati

2 Responses to “Hillary’s Nose Just Keeps Getting Longer and Longer”

  1. The campaign pressures are getting to her, she’s going batty! :)

  2. Could be that nobody is perfect, also Hillary, but if we are talking about lies, Axelrod all base for Obama is made of lies. He was in senat and what he ever did all sever years he was there???? “Present”. That’s all he did. Are you so sure about real reasons he could be agaist that war? Is he generally against any war where muslims are involved or? It is against of what? It is not clear becuase there is no traces about his work in that direction: JUST WORDS!
    It’s easy to be against talking and talking and talking and saying lies: he’s “father and Kennedy” story, Rezko story, against war in Iraq story and no any action about.
    All based on white people sence of guilt and stupidity. He’s nice guy, but that’s not enough to lead 300 milions of people. It’s not a beauty contest. You have a recession in front of the door.
    Think about it!

Discussion Area - Leave a Comment