ViceZilla’s Views

Tags: Bush Administration, Political Rhetoric by vicezilla
No Comments »

I’m not exactly sure where Bush thinks he can be critical about the state of democracy in Russia, when his own back yard is in questionable shape! Or maybe it’s because somebody else got Time magazine’s “Person of the Year” award instead of him.

Who knows? All I can say is President Bush is in no position to be critical. President Bush is critical of Russian President Putin who has tightened control of the courts and the media and maneuvered to retain power as his term ends. “What will the country look like 10 years from now? My hope, of course, is that Russia is a country that understands there needs to be checks and balances, free and fair elections and a vibrant press.”

Sounds like Bush is upset that another leader is moving in on his shtick! Controlling the courts and media, checks and balances, and fair elections? Are we sure he’s talking about Putin and not himself?

Read More

Tags: Bush Administration by vicezilla
No Comments »

Bush is of course!

In a disgusting display of cowardice, Congress (you remember them. They were the ones elected to power with the promise of putting an end to Bush’s war in Iraq.) has caved in to Bush’s demands of spending more money for the Iraq war with no strings attached.

An extra $30 billion for the war in Iraq is what the Democrats are proposing, with a string attached of course. The string is not a timeline for troop withdrawal from Iraq, which everyone knows Bush would veto anyway. No, the string is an additional $11 billion for domestic programs. That’s right! Congress is now “bribing” the President for money for domestic programs by giving him money to prolong the war in Iraq!

Way to go Congress! That’s the way to put your foot down and assert your authority over the Government checkbook! What kind of a crazy, ludicrous, f#@%*d up mess have we gotten ourselves into?

Read More

Tags: Bush Administration by vicezilla
No Comments »

Once again Bush vetoed a bill expanding a popular children’s health care program for the second time.

“Because the Congress has chosen to send me an essentially identical bill that has the same problems as the flawed bill I previously vetoed, I must veto this legislation too,” Bush wrote in a message to the House of Representatives. In vetoing the legislation, Bush said “this bill does not put poor children first and it moves our country’s health care system in the wrong direction.”

So Bush thinks that increasing the SCHIP funding to $60 billion over five years from its present $25 billion isn’t helping cover more poor children? It’s high time for Mr. Bush to get a grip on priorities! There are other things that desperately need funding in this country other than a senseless, illegal war. Children’s health care is important, regardless of whether they are poor or not. Children’s health should be first and foremost a high priority in any Administration. Obviously it’s not a high priority in Bush’s.

One can only wonder how long and at what cost it will take to repair the damage done to this country because of the Bush Administration.

Tags: Bush Administration by vicezilla
No Comments »

I just finished reading the press release from Senator Whitehouse on his findings of the legal opinions issued by the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) regarding the “Protect America Act.”

In a nutshell, Bush has set himself up to be the supreme Dictator. He makes the rules, which he can change at any time to suit his needs. The three branches of Government all seem to have been replaced by one person, the President. Or is it Dictator now?

From Senator Whitehouse’s press release: To give you an example of what I read, I have gotten three legal propositions from these OLC opinions declassified. Here they are, as accurately as my note taking could reproduce them from the classified documents. Listen for yourself. I will read all three, and then discuss each one.

1. “An executive order cannot limit a President. There is no constitutional requirement for a President to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it.”

2. “The President, exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, can determine whether an action is a lawful exercise of the President’s authority under Article II.”

3. “The Department of Justice is bound by the President’s legal determinations.”

Let’s start with number one. Bear in mind that the so-called Protect America Act that was stampeded through this great body in August provides no statutory protections for Americans traveling abroad from government wiretapping. None if you’re a businesswoman traveling on business overseas, none if you’re a father taking the kids to the Caribbean, none if you’re visiting uncles or aunts in Italy or Ireland, none even if you’re a soldier in the uniform of the United States posted overseas. The Bush Administration provided in that hastily-passed law no statutory restrictions on their ability to wiretap you at will, to tap your cell phone, your e-mail, whatever. The only restriction is an executive order called 12333, which limits executive branch surveillance to Americans who the Attorney General determines to be agents of a foreign power. That’s what the executive order says.

But what does this administration say about executive orders? An executive order cannot limit a President. There is no constitutional requirement for a President to issue a new executive order whenever he wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order. Rather than violate an executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it. “Whenever (the President) wishes to depart from the terms of a previous executive order, he may do so because the executive order cannot limit a President.” And he doesn’t have to change the executive order, or give notice that he’s violating it, because by depart(ing) from the executive order, the President has instead modified or waived it. So unless Congress acts, here is what legally prevents this President from wiretapping Americans traveling abroad at will: nothing.

Nothing. That was among the most egregious flaws in the bill passed during the August stampede they orchestrated by the Bush Administration and this OLC opinion shows why we need to correct it.

Here’s number two. The President, exercising his constitutional authority under Article II, can determine whether an action is a lawful exercise of the President’s authority under Article II. Yes, that’s right. The President, according to the George W. Bush OLC, has Article II power to determine what the scope of his Article II powers are. Never mind a little decision called Marbury v. Madison, written by Chief Justice John Marshall in 1803, establishing the proposition that it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. Does this administration agree that it is emphatically the province and the duty of the judicial department to say what the President’s authority is under Article II? No, it is the President, according to this OLC, who decides the legal limits of his own Article II power.

The question is whether an action is a lawful exercise of the President’s authority under Article II, is to be determined by the President’s minions, exercising his constitutional authority under Article II. It really makes you wonder, who are these people? They have got to be smart people to get there. How can people who are so smart be so misguided?

And then, it gets worse. Remember point three? The Department of Justice is bound by the President’s legal determinations. Let that sink in a minute. The Department of Justice is bound by the President’s legal determinations.

Read More

Tags: Bush Administration by vicezilla
No Comments »